Prediction of Tom Gorman vs William Harris Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
T. Gorman vs W. Harris

Tom Gorman

USA

1

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

William Harris

USA

1

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Gorman 1 - 1 Harris

They have played 5 sets in total, with Tom Gorman winning 3 and William Harris winning 2. The last match between Tom Gorman and William Harris was at the Haverford, 11-08-1969, Round: R2, Surface: Grass, with Tom Gorman getting the victory 6-0 6-1.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Gorman	1
Harris	1

Last 2 H2H Matches:

(R2) Haverford(08-11-69)

Stats

Tom Gorman

William Harris

(F) Cincinnati(07-07-68)

Stats

William Harris

Tom Gorman

T. Gorman vs W. Harris H2H Profile

T. Gorman	Stats	W. Harris
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
58.73% (427-300)	Career Total W/L	50.00% (8-8)
0	Clay	1
1	Grass	0
9	Titles	1
1	Total H2H Matches	1
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

T. Gorman vs W. Harris Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Tom Gorman has won 0% of points on their second serve, while William Harris has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Tom Gorman, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while William Harris has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Tom Gorman has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas William Harris has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Tom Gorman has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with William Harris winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Tom Gorman has their best career surface win % on N/A, winning 68% (W/L 15/7), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 71/62). William Harris has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 68% (W/L 8/6), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/2).
Player level: In the last year, Tom Gorman has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as William Harris has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Tom Gorman winning 1 times and William Harris being victorious 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Tom Gorman winning 3 and William Harris winning 2.
The last match between Tom Gorman and William Harris was at the Haverford, 11-08-1969, Round: R2, Surface: Grass, with Tom Gorman getting the victory 6-0 6-1.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Tom Gorman has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while William Harris has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Tom Gorman has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while William Harris has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Tom Gorman has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and William Harris has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Tom Gorman vs William Harris Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

T. Gorman vs W. Harris H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

T. Gorman	Stats	W. Harris
1	H2H Matches Won	1
3	Sets Won	2
22	Games Won	16
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
50% (1/2)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	50% (1/2)
0% (0/1)	Deciding Set Win %	100% (1/1)
50% (1/2)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
50% (1/2)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	50% (1/2)

Recent Performance Stats

T. Gorman Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Sydney Indoor - 13-10-1980
R3 Phil DentP. Dent	L	6-3 4-6 6-4	Stats
Stowe - 11-08-1980
R4 Vincent Van PattenV. Van	L	7-6 6-3	Stats
R3 George AmayaG. Amaya	W	6-4 6-3	Stats
Wimbledon - 23-06-1980
R1 Stanislav BirnerS. Birner	L	6-4 7-5 6-4	Stats
Surbiton - 16-06-1980
R3 Mark CoxM. Cox	L	2-6 7-6 6-2	Stats

View All

W. Harris Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Haverford - 11-08-1969
R2 Tom GormanT. Gorman	L	6-0 6-1	Stats
Toronto - 04-08-1969
R3 Frank TutvinF. Tutvin	L	7-5 6-1 6-3	Stats
Indianapolis - 21-07-1969
R2 Jim OsborneJ. Osborne	L	6-3 6-4	Stats
Cincinnati - 14-07-1969
R2 Onny ParunO. Parun	L	6-4 6-3	Stats
Washington - 07-07-1969
R2 Terry AddisonT. Addison	W	6-1 4-6 6-0	Stats

View All

T. Gorman vs W. Harris Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

T. Gorman	Stats	W. Harris
58.73% (427/300)	YTD Win/Loss	50.00% (8/8)
56.06% (1022/801)	Sets Win/Loss	45.24% (19/23)
51.57% (9382/8811)	Games Win/Loss	48.29% (198/212)
60.48% (150/98)	Hard Win/Loss	0% (0/0)
53.38% (71/62)	Clay Win/Loss	57.14% (8/6)
56.44% (92/71)	Indoor Hard W/L	0% (0/0)
61.49% (99/62)	Grass Win/Loss	0.00% (0/2)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
514	Average Opponent Rank	449.69
58.97% (46/32)	Slam W/L	0.00% (0/1)
64.10% (25/14)	Masters W/L	66.67% (4/2)
54.55% (6/5)	Cups W/L	0% (0/0)
58.32% (347/248)	Main Tour W/L	44.44% (4/5)
75.00% (3/1)	Challenger W/L	0% (0/0)
59% (361/607)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	57% (8/14)
56% (58/103)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/2)
52% (12/23)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	0% (0/0)
61% (154/252)	Deciding Set Win %	71% (5/7)
86% (386/333)	1st Set Won, Won Match	83% (6/5)
14% (386/53)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	17% (6/1)
27% (327/89)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	30% (10/3)